Open six websites from your sector. Six clinics, six scaffolders, six commercial cleaners, six accountancy practices. Look at the thumbnails before reading any copy. Most will be indistinguishable.
You can predict the layout: hero image of a smiling team, a “We do X, Y, and Z” services grid, a stock testimonial slider, a generic Get a Quote form. The copy reads the same way too — “passionate”, “bespoke”, “tailored”, “going the extra mile”. The colour palette is one of three blues.
This is the agency template. It is not a design failure. It is a positioning failure that designers paper over.
Why the template wins
Agency templates exist because they are profitable for the agency. They reduce the production cost of a website to near-zero — a junior can implement one in a week — and they give clients an artefact that looks “professional” relative to the no-website baseline. Both sides feel like they got what they paid for.
The problem is that templates do the same thing for every competitor in your sector. If you look like the template, you look like every other business that bought the template. The buyer who is comparing six options in a tab cannot distinguish you from the other five.
The premium you wanted to charge — for being more careful, better-credentialed, or simply better than the median — evaporates. You are now a commodity. The buyer picks on price.
What anti-template looks like
The opposite of template positioning is not visual flair. It is the visible exercise of judgement. Every section of the site commits to a position that another business in your sector could not credibly hold.
Examples we’ve shipped:
-
Birkinshaw Aesthetics opened the homepage with credentials: a 25-year NHS nurse, Harley Street training, British Menopause Society member. Most aesthetic clinics open with smiling injector portraits and a price list. The position is the founder’s clinical background; the homepage made the position visible.
-
Dunnrite Scaffolding put accreditations in the header on every page. CISRS, CHAS, NASC, zero safety incidents. The standard trades site buries this on an About page. The position is operational rigour; the layout made it impossible to miss.
-
Andrews of Holmfirth anchored the brand on three colours pulled from the shop signage, photographed product in-shop, and built the order flow around collection-first. The position is fifty years of being the local shop, not a generic online deli. The homepage performed the position.
In each case the site is not visually loud. It is positionally loud. A stranger reading the homepage learns something specific about the business in the first ten seconds.
How to do it on your own site
Three questions to ask, in order:
-
What can we say that our top five competitors cannot credibly say? The answer is your real positioning. If the answer is “nothing”, the business has a positioning problem before it has a website problem.
-
What does the homepage need to show, before the visitor reads a single word, to make that position legible? Sometimes it’s a credential. Sometimes it’s a specific style of work. Sometimes it’s a refusal — a list of what you do not do. Whatever it is, it goes above the fold.
-
What do we have to refuse to do, in order to keep the position credible? Anti-template positioning is enforced by refusal. If your “we focus on clinical depth” site also offers wedding makeup, the position dies. The discipline is the differentiator.
Why most agencies won’t help you do this
Most agencies sell templates because templates are profitable for them. A site that takes a position takes ten times longer to design, requires the agency to think alongside the client, and risks the client saying no to a draft. Profit margins drop. The pitch deck loses its “we are flexible” line.
If you want a templated site, the market has six hundred providers and the price is around £400. If you want a site that takes a position, the market is much smaller and the price reflects it.
Lucent is in the second market. So is everybody who wants to leave the commodity layer.
Related
-
Process
How long does it take to build a website?
A typical agency says six to twelve weeks. We say ten working days. Neither answer is a lie. They describe two completely different processes.
-
Pricing
How much does a website cost in the UK? (2026 honest breakdown)
Most agencies give you a range so wide it tells you nothing. Here are the actual pound figures, broken down by what you get, why prices vary, and where the money goes.
